WordPress Post Revisions Everything You Need to Know

WordPress post revisions are a helpful core feature that let you quickly view previous versions of your posts or pages, as well as see what changes have been made and restore one of those previous versions, if desired.In this article, we will cover everything that you need to know about WordPress post revisions. In addition to learning what revisions are and how they function, youll also learn how to:Access all the revisions for your postsCompare two revisions against one anotherRestore a revision to the WordPress editorChange how many revisions WordPress storesCompletely disable revisions by default in WordPress:Every time that you save a draft or publish/update a post, WordPress saves a copy of how the post looked at that exact moment as a revision.You can always go back in and access that specific revision to view it or restore it to the current version of your post. Its there forever.Additionally, each revision also tracks which user made the changes and when, which is helpful fo r keeping track of whos doing what with your content.How autosaves connect with revisionsRevisions are connected to another feature called autosaves. By default, WordPress will save a copy of your content every 60 seconds while youre editing it (this saved copy is overwritten every 60 seconds there can only ever be one autosave for each user).This is to help you avoid losing your content in the event of a browser crash or lost Internet connection.You can also access autosaves using the revision interface. Autosaves are labeled Autosave and are marked with red text, though, which makes them stand out from regular revisions.How to view WordPress post revisionsTo access revisions for your post, look for the Revisions option under Publish in the WordPress editor. Then, click the Browse link.Note, this option will only show up after you have at least two different versions of the post. If youve never edited the post before, you wont see it:In the Revisions interface, you can use the sli der to move between different revisions. Each time you move the slider, youll see:A version of the previous revision on the leftA version of the selected revision on the rightAs you drag the slider, youll also see:Who made each revision (helpful for multi-author blogs or working with editors)When the revision was madeTheres also helpful color-coding to indicate the specific changes that were made between each revision. For example:A green background indicates added contentA red background indicates deleted contentHow to compare different revisions against one anotherBy dragging the slider, you can compare two revisions but only in sequential order.If you want to compare two revisions that didnt happen sequentially, you can check the box for Compare any two revisions and then use the additional slider option to select the exact revisions to compare:How to restore a post revisionWhen you restore a post revision, you overwrite the current WordPress editor to restore the content from th e revision.To do this, all you need to do is select the revision that you want to restore with the slider and then click the Restore This Revision button:If you select an autosave, youll see Restore This Autosave instead:Once you click the button, youll be taken back to the WordPress editor and youll see the restored version. Youll need to save a draft or update the post to make the revision permanent, though.Of course, if you want to restore the version that you overwrote, you can always jump back into the Revisions area and restore the previous version from before you restored the current version. Its revision-ception!How to modify how WordPress handles post revisionsSome webmasters want to modify the WordPress post revisions system for performance reasons. By default, WordPress stores a separate revision every single time you make a change to a piece of content.If youre constantly editing and adjusting content, this can quickly add up.See, each time that WordPress saves a revisio n, it stores a complete copy of that revision in your sites database. This is, in part, why youre able to speed up your WordPress site by periodically optimizing your WordPress database to remove post revisions and other gunk.For this reason, some WordPress hosts, like WP Engine, will automatically disable revisions on all the sites hosted there.But if you want or need to do things yourself, there are two main ways to modify the WordPress post revisions functionality:Change how many revisions WordPress stores. You can, for example, cap the revision number at 10 so that WordPress deletes older revisions once it reaches 10 stored revisions.Completely disable revisions. Wed recommend limiting revisions over completely disabling them. But it is possible to completely disable the revision functionality.****Even if you disable post revisions, your database will still store all the revisions from before you disabled them. To fix this, you can use a database cleaner plugin.To perform both t hese actions in the most user-friendly way possible, the free WP-Disable plugin is a great option: Reduce HTTP Requests, Disable Emojis Disable Embeds, Speedup WooCommerce Author(s): optimisation.io - jody nesbittCurrent Version: 1.5.21Last Updated: August 24, 2018wp-disable.1.5.21.zip 80%Ratings 202,788Downloads WP 4.5+Requires It lets you manually adjust or disable the number of stored revisions. To use it:Install and activate the plugin from WordPress.org (heres how to install WordPress plugins)Click on the new Optimisation.io tab in your WordPress dashboardGo to the Admin tab in the plugins interfaceUse the drop-down beside Post revisions number. You can choose a number of revisions to save or select 0 to disable revisionsHow to modify WordPress post revisions via wp-config.phpWe dont recommend this option for beginners (stick to the plugin above). But if youre comfortable editing your sites wp-config.php file, you can also modify WordPress post revisions using WP_POST_R EVISIONS.To modify the number of revisions, use this code snippet:define( 'WP_POST_REVISIONS', 3 );Replace the number 3 with the desired number of revisions.Or, to completely turn off post revisions, you can set it to false:define('WP_POST_REVISIONS', false);Wrapping things upWordPress post revisions are a handy feature that allow you to quickly compare or restore older versions of your posts.While they are helpful, and we wouldnt recommend completely disabling them, they can clutter up your database if you constantly edit posts.For that reason, we recommend using the WP-Disable plugin or editing your sites wp-config.php file to cap the number of revisions. A number like 10 is a good starting place.Have any other questions about post revisions in WordPress? Leave a comment and well try to help out! Everything you need to know about #WordPress post revisions

buy custom Denial of Service in Computer Communication essay

buy custom Denial of Service in Computer Communication essay Introduction Denial of service (DoS) attack is usually hard to differentiate from other regular activities within a computer network. It can be associated with an observed reduction in response time while accessing information from a website or network that an attack is being undertaken. Denial of service in computer communication is thus defined as the incident whereby a hacker impedes usage of information and services by the rightful users, from a certain website or network. A hacker manages to prevent users from reaching their e-mails, information, online accounts in addition to other services that depend on the affected section of the network. Almost every computer user is vulnerable to these attacks (US-CERT;, 2004). This article will centre on understanding denial of service in a computer network or a website. It will draw out some of the effective ways of preventing such attacks. The most frequent and noticeable form of DoS attack takes place when a hacker fills a computer network with a lot of information, thereby affecting its computational capabilities. What follows is that when a person writes a URL (uniform resource locator) for a certain website into his or her browser, a request is sent to the server to allow the person view information in the site (US-CERT;, 2004). In case the website is overloaded with such request, its response time will be slow or even not be able to process the request at al. This is because the server can only process a definite number of requests at any given time. The user is therefore denied a service from the website. In addition, another common attack that results to denial of service is use of spam email messages. Every individual with an email account is allocated a particular quota, which helps to bind the information capacity that a person can have in his or her email account at any particular time (Abliz, 2011). When the attacker sends many email messages to the account, he utilizes the quota thereby preventing the person from receiving genuine email massages. Due to the recent increase in modern internet viruses, proportionate number of compromised computers and computer networks has ensued. As a result, these computers can be used to attack most of the websites (US-CERT;, 2004). Attackers normally end up extorting legitimate users huge sums of money to cease their attacks. Types of Denial of Service Attacks SYN Attack After a client sends a request to the server in a computer network, a session is established between them using the Transport Control Program (TCP). However, there is a small space that is left to take care of the messages used for initiating the session. They are packets of information which comprise of a SYN field that searches for the order in the swapping over of messages (Abliz, 2011). In this case, what a hacker does is to send a big number of connection prompts then cease from replying to them. As a result, the initial packet is left in the buffer thereby denying other genuine connection requests from being accommodated (Abliz, 2011). Although the packet is eventually dropped, it ends up denying other rightful users from accessing the information in the website. In case this problem occurs, a network administrato can employ local tools to mitigate it. The size of the buffer and the timeout period can be adjusted to minimize chances of its occurrence. Teardrop Attack In this type of attack, a hacker targets the manner in which a relatively large packet of information is handled by a router for fragmentation purposes by the internet protocol (IP). An offset is usually identified at the beginning of the first packet and the fragmented packets are later reassembled on reception (Vacca, 2009). Nevertheless, in case the computer on the receiving end does not have an established plan to handle this situation, the overall system can crash thereby denying its rightful users the required services. Smurf Attack In this type of attack, a hacker sends an Internet Protocol (IP) ping request to the receiving computer network. Consequently, this packet requests to be distributed to various hosts in the local network on the receiving end. This packet also specifies that it is from another website, which is intended to receive denial of service (Vacca, 2009). The target computer is therefore flooded with ping replies which prevent it from differentiating the actual traffic. Distributed denial of service attack This is an incident whereby a hacker uses someone else computer to launch an attack on another computer. The hacker normally takes advantage of the available weaknesses in someone else personal computer. He can use tools and software that forces someone else computer to send spam messages to certain email addresses (Vacca, 2009). This type of attack is known as distributed since it includes many computers and networks to initiate the attack. Handling DoS Attacks Generally, a person or an institution can defend itself from DoS attacks through preparation, detection and reaction stages. Preparation stage comprises coming up with a security policy, development of good and effective security protocols among other methods. This phase also ensures that the most important services are independent and therefore they are separate from each other (Dawson Raghavan, 2011). Furthermore, there is need to create a collaborative plan with the internet service provider in addition to other response plans at the event of an attack. The detection stage is supposed to occur automatically. In order to respond within the shortest time possible, the attack should be detected early enough (Molsa, 2006). The longer it takes for a network administrator to detect an attack, the more the loss incurred and possibilities of counteracting the attack. The other stage is known as the reaction phase. It comprises of two sub-sections, categorization and mitigation. In the categorization stage, the attacked user should authenticate if the attack is actually going on and also be able to evaluate it so as to identify the notable features of the attack. When the nature of the attack is identified, it helps in mitigation stage. For a long time, network administrators have been using labor-intensive procedures to respond to DoS attacks. These procedures are usually labor intensive since they involve tracing the route path of the attack traffic manually so as to identify the source. However, there are more elaborate automatic systems which are used to provide quick response to such attacks (US-CERT;, 2004). It is worth noting that reaction strategies usually centre on ways of mitigating the impacts of the attack. Defense Mechanisms Every host on the internet can be a target to DoS attack no matter how complex its security system is. The safety of computer networks is therefore dependent on how much protection is given to other hosts that are connected to the internet. It is of paramount importance to detect compromised computer devices connected to the internet to aid in protection against DoS attacks (Dawson Raghavan, 2011). The effectiveness in defending against DoS attacks is dependent on how fast attack is detected and counteractive measures employed. When connected to the internet, the following defense options should be employed to eliminate loopholes for DoS attack. Any service that is unnecessary should be done away with. This helps to reduce chances of exploitation by a hacker to access susceptible areas of the network attacks (Dawson Raghavan, 2011). Therefore, any application on a computer that is not in use or relevant, should be removed. Additionally, a firewall should be installed in any computer or network to monitor access to the network. The firewall helps to filter out the general public from accessing information that is shared in a local network. Connections to an ISP (internet service provider) is supposed to be well looked into. Also, access to the wireless Local area networks and other access routes to the internet should also be well monitored against attacks (Dawson Raghavan, 2011). This implies that routers should be well configured to prevent creating points of vulnerability. People should be encouraged to use passwords that are not easy to guess and that cannot be easily cracked by hackers. The passwords can also be changed from time to time. It is very important to use antivirus software that is always up to date. This will help to detect and eliminate viruses effectively (Vacca, 2009). Users should be very careful when accessing attached files and links sent through emails. They should also take caution while installing software on their personal computers (Vacca, 2009). There is need to read and understand the license agreement before software installation. However, most of the time, people do not pay attention to the license agreement requirements which defines the status of the contract between the user and the manufacturer of the software. Sometimes, these agreements allow third parties to access crucial information which can later provide best avenues for DoS attack. Conclusion Denial of service attacks is currently a common problem on the internet. It encourages cyber-terrorism and other related attacks on the internet that demands illegal extortions. It is an activity that can cost legitimate users huge amounts of money. The saddest thing is that there are readily available tools that necessitate execution of these illegal activities (Vacca, 2009). However, when effective defense mechanisms are employed as outlined above, an individual or an organization is safe from these threats. Buy custom Denial of Service in Computer Communication essay

The Future Tense With Will and Going to

The Future Tense With 'Will' and 'Going to' The future in English can be rather confusing. There are two future forms used in most conversations: the future with will and the future with going to. The main difference between the two forms is that going to is used for plans and intentions made before the moment of speaking, and the will to speak about the future at the moment of speaking. Study these basic forms and then use the referenced resources to practice these forms. Teachers can print out these materials for use in-class, or find help with how to teach future forms, as well as the lesson plans suggested below. The Future With Will There are two basic future tenses used to describe things that happen in the future. Besides these two there are some other future tenses which can be started on the advanced future tenses page. The first future tense is the future with will. Use the future with will to talk about an event in the future that you have just decided to do, for predictions and for promises. Examples: I think Ill go to that party next week.The economy will get better soon.Yes, I will marry you. Future With Will Structure: Positive:  Subject will verb I, You, He, She, We, They will come to the party. Negative:  Subject will not (wont) verb I, You, He, She, We, They wont have time tomorrow. Questions:  Question word will subject verb What will he, she, you, we, they do? The Future With Going To The future with going to is used to express events you have already planned in the future and your intentions for the future. We sometimes also use the present continuous for planned events in the near future. Examples: Shes going to attend university and study to become a doctor.Were going to make the presentation next week. Future With Going to Structure: Positive:  Subject to be going to verb I am going to attend the meeting.He, She is going to attend the meeting.You, We, They are going to attend the meeting. Negative:  Subject to be not going to verb Im not going to visit Rome next year.He, She isnt going to visit Rome next year.You, We, They arent going to visit Rome next year. Questions:  Ã‚  (Question word) to be subject going to verb Where am I going to stay?Where is she, he going to stay?Where are you, we, they going to stay? Additional Future Tense Resources Here is an in depth guide to   both the future with will and with going to.Take the  Future Forms Quiz for Advanced LearnersResource for ESL Teachers. This intermediate lesson focuses solely on the future with will and going to and  includes a step by step guide through the lesson and handouts to use in class. Activities With the Future With Will and Going to Some activities that will help you practice: Planning a Party - Dialogue concentrating on the future with will and going to.The Meeting - Dialogue with schedules, future plansThe Oregon Weather Forecast - Dialogue with the use of the future with will for predictions, weather vocabularyEnglish Tenses Timeline Chart - study how the future forms with will and going to relate to other tenses on a timeline.

Sketches Bill Cleggs and Mathew Dickmans prescription for eudaimonia Essay

Sketches Bill Cleggs and Mathew Dickmans prescription for eudaimonia - Essay Example For this reason, Aristotle’s ethics and politics are both heavily focused on virtue (Gallager, 2010). According to Rorty (1980, pp.07), Eudemonia essentially involve just the activity of the theoretical intellect of human life and action and accordance with the broader excellence of moral virtues and practical wisdom. This view connects the eudemonia with the conception of human nature as composite, that is, as involving the interaction of reason, emotion, perception and action in a body full of soul. Ninety days is a short novel that situates a lot of drama into an easy to read 194 pages. This book covers the months following Cleggs decision to go into an inpatient facility to renounce cocaine and alcohol at age 34.  It’s the story of Cleggs battle to get back his life, an obvious and persuasive story of the opportunity of recovery. However, it sketches an overwhelming depiction of the loads of challenges one will tolerate on this journey. The twin brother of poet Michael Dickman, poet Matthew Dickman was born on August 20, 1975 grew up in Lents, a working-class suburb of Portland, Oregon. He was raised by his mother. He earned a BA at the University of Oregon after that he earned an MFA from the University of Texas at Austins Michener Center. Dickman’s unveiling collection, All American Poem (2008), was chosen by Tony Hoagland for the American Poetry Review’s Honickman First Book Prize in Poetry and also won the 2009 Oregon Book Award for Poetry. According to Perring (2012) Ninety Days  is a follow up to Cleggs tale of his decline into drug use and his ultimate entrance into drug rehabilitation. Bill Clegg discloses to his readers as he explain the laborious journey he took to attain his first 90 days of sobriety. Any person who has not gone through the experience of substance mistreatment would not be able to recognize how an individual feels who has exactly gone the whole thing. Actually it is a

How Can Health Care Professionals Effectively Deal Sociologically With Essay

How Can Health Care Professionals Effectively Deal Sociologically With Issues Of Domestic Violence In Pregnancy - Essay Example This essay stresses that surprisingly, and in contrast to previous research on women residing in domestic violence shelters, emotional support was not a significant predictor of mental health when severity of violence was controlled. Practical aid, however, predicted both anxiety and self-esteem. This finding is consistent with the only shelter study that compared emotional and practical supports. This paper makes a conclusion that there are several important intervention implications from this study. First, critical support plays a key role in the mental health of women who have violent partners. Thus, support for women in violent relationships must avoid criticism of their lives and decisions. Clearly, the ability to talk about the abuse in an empathic, non-critical environment is an important key to positive mental health for these women. Because homophily was related to criticism in this study, it may be that advocates, rather than homophilous peer support groups, provide the most effective interventions. In addition, practical aid, rather than emotional support, was related to positive mental health. Thus, concrete assistance with daily life hassles and challenges should be a high priority for agencies serving battered women. Finally, the positive relationship between nonhomophilous supporters and mental health suggests that agencies might assist battered women in locatin g new sources of support in order to develop a social network composed of more women who have not been battered

Birth Of A Nation: Art Or Propaganda Essay -- essays research papers

Birth of A Nation: Art or Propaganda   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Mankind, engaging in war, driven by whatever instincts guide him, seeks to keep the defeats and victories of battle in his memory and on his conscience. To accomplish this men have used paint and canvas, ink and paper, or instrument and song in their effort to communicate the tragedy and glory of war. Never, before the career of D.W. Griffith had anyone attempted to bring the subject to film. The result of his efforts, weaknesses aside, mark a change in attitude towards film as a media. Perhaps audiences previously going to a picture expected emotional manipulation. After all, years before the film Birth of a nation, makers of film employed techniques to evoke pathos from viewers; whether through the use of a sobbing mother, a frightened child or what have you. In this respect the film was not a ground-breaker; However, through its effective use of devices such as symbolism, foreshadowing and allusions, as well as building on and arguably perfecting film techniques such as continuity editing, intercutting and close-ups, he transformed film from mere entertainment to art and propaganda.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  To present and explore a theme, symbolism is used everywhere in literature. Whether the image is subtle or obvious it is regardless a sign of considerable calculation and effort. In Birth of a nation Griffith places symbols everywhere, in doing this he merges literary devices of written works wi...

Was the Atomic Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima Justified

Were the Americans justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945? The dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945 by the Americans is a very controversial issue with no definite answer. Both sides of the issue have very justifiable arguments. Reasons for dropping the bomb include the fact that Truman’s options were limited at this point in the war, that the bomb did have the desired outcome of Japans surrender and that the majority of reasons America had for dropping the bomb are justifiable. On the other hand, the atomic bomb was complete new technology and there is no way that Japan could have possibly been ready for it and for that reason the dropping of the atomic bomb is very much morally and ethically wrong. It is also important to consider that two bombs were dropped, both with different motivations and it is quite possible that while one is justifiable, the other is not. There were many reasons why America would have chosen to drop the bomb and the majority can be justified. Before the atomic bomb was dropped, America was nearing the end of the war. They had made the Potsdam declaration requesting Japans surrender and at this point had the Japanese at a very weak position. At a similar time, the Americans had completed the development of the Atomic bomb or Project Manhattan that, after Germany surrendered, had no other competition. A lot money had been put into the development of the bomb and at this point, Truman’s options were limited. Invasion was out of the question due to the Japanese’s strong military and patriotic values: The continuation of conventional bombings and a naval blockade were also considered but deemed unsuitable. The negation of surrender had been tried with the ‘Potsdam Declaration’ and had failed. It is important to point out that by ignoring the declaration; the Japanese in effect gave their acceptance of the Americans threats of ‘prompt and utter destruction. ’[1] America and Britain were both aware that the development of the bomb meant they no longer relied on the allied troops from Russia, and with the fear of communism, this was a motivation for the dropping of the bomb: ‘It is quite clear that the US do not at the present time desire Russian participation in the war against Japan’ [2]. There was also the question of time. The atomic bomb was by far the quickest way that America could see for the ending of the war, and they were eager to end the war as before long, Russia would become involved making a heavier casualty rate inevitable. America were also a very powerful country now they had the development of the Atomic Bomb, it would have been a waste to not be able to show their true power and the true destruction they could use through the bomb. There is also the point that the Americans were looking for revenge against the Japanese, as they had injured and killed many American soldiers, and even more to come, had the Americans not taken quick action. Looking back at the dropping of the bomb, it is possible to say that it was a method of prevention in many different circumstances. Firstly, the dropping of the bomb meant that the war would be over: ‘The atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended World War II. There can be no doubt of that. ’ [3] It is possible that leaving the war longer could have resulted in a much worse fatality rate for both Japan and America. Also, the dropping of the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima effectively decided the use of atomic technology for weapons for the future. Before the dropping of the bomb, people had no idea of the severity and power of atomic weaponry and therefore, the argument can be made that the dropping of the atomic bomb prevented a lot more serious cases that could have happened say the power of atomic bombs was not explored at this time. The dropping of the atomic bomb caused great loss of life, and there are many arguments suggesting the dropping of the bomb was both morally and ethically wrong. There is no way that the Japanese could have been prepared for the dropping of the atomic bomb as the world had never witnessed something like the bomb before. The Americans had the opportunity of demonstrating the power of the bomb on a deserted area and showing the Japanese what they were facing. This was proposed by a number of American scientists, but rejected by the Military Leaders: ‘we did not think exploding one of these things as a firecracker over a desert was likely to be impressive. ’[4] There was the option of dropping the bomb on purely a military target, yet the Americans chose a target that not only affected Japans military, but took the lives of many civilians. The Americans were always slightly racist towards the Japanese or ‘colored people’ and this could easily have been secret motivation for the dropping of such a severe form of bomb. There is also the consideration of the two different bombs. The American military leaders would have been completely aware of the severity of damage of atomic bombs after Little Boy was dropped yet they still went on to drop Fat Man. It is possible that while the first bomb could be excusable, the dropping of a second, in full knowledge of the damage that it would cause, is not only unnecessary but definitely morally incorrect. It is also important to consider the Truman’s alternatives once again. From the American’s point of view, Truman’s options were very limited, but peace could have been found through the Japanese and the Soviet Union, a pathway which the President was aware of but didn’t really explore. It can also be pointed out that the Potsdam declaration was a very harsh document, especially on a country with such strong patriotic values. Had the declaration not requested ‘unconditional surrender’[5] and had in fact let Japan keep some of their imperial rule, they could have been more likely to accept the declaration. Japan was already very vulnerable when America chose to drop the bomb. In reality, it was only a matter of time before Japan would have needed to surrender anyway. America knew that Japan would need to surrender soon as they were unable to import or export goods: ‘it was quite logical to hope and expect that with the proper kind of warning the Japanese would have made peace’. [6] It really was only a matter of time before Japan would have had to surrender and America knew that. It is possible that the Americans were not just interested in the ending of the war, but had other reasons such as racial discrimination, revenge and greed for power to drop the two atomic bombs. In my opinion, the Americans have enough reasons to justify the dropping of the bomb. They gave the Japanese sufficient warning of their plan through the Potsdam declaration and it was the Japanese’s mistake to ignore this. They also completed the desired outcome with Japan’s surrender. For these reasons America can justify their reasons for dropping the bomb. However, being able to justify something does not mean it is necessarily the best thing to do, and I think that it was morally incorrect to make the Japanese uffer to the extent that they did considering that the war was almost over. The fact that America chose to drop two bombs changes my opinion significantly as well. The first bomb can be looked with the idea that America was not aware of the damage they could cause, however a second bomb was cruel and inexcusable. The Americans were after more than just the end of the war, they wanted the Japanese to feel their power and to have revenge: ‘In being first to use it we had developed ethical standards common to barbarians in the dark ages. [7] The bomb however has benefitted the world in the way that it has prevented anything like the atomic bomb disaster from occurring again, and the use of this technology earlier on could easily have prevented a later, more severe disaster. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima can be justified and looked at as a mistake that possibly had many benefits. The dropping of the bomb on Nagasaki was an example of the American’s greed for power and race driven revenge. In conclusion, I think that America had very strong reasons for dropping the bomb, some of which are valid and some of which are not. This said they should not have dropped it as they knew the effect that this bomb was going to have on Japan, especially when Japan was so unprepared, and there would have been much more appropriate ways of ending the war. ———————– [1] Lewis, Robert AGORA, Vol. 25, No 1, 1990, HTAV, Source 9, page 29 [2] Lewis, Robert AGORA Vol. 25, No 2, 1990, HTAV, Source 22, page 19 [3] Lewis, Robert AGORA, Vol. 25, No 1, 1990, HTAV, page 19 [4] Lewis, Robert AGORA Vol. 25, No 2, 1990, HTAV, Source 16, page 14 [5] Lewis, Robert AGORA, Vol. 25, No 1, 1990, HTAV, Source 9, page 29 [6] Ibid page 34, source 14 [7] Ibid page 19